Eliminating health disparities in LGBT individuals begins in the ED

Written by: David Feiger, MD (NUEM ‘22) Edited by: Vidya Eswaran, MD (NUEM ‘20) Expert Commentary by: Will Laplant, MD, MPH '20

Written by: David Feiger, MD (NUEM ‘22) Edited by: Vidya Eswaran, MD (NUEM ‘20) Expert Commentary by: Will Laplant, MD, MPH '20


Introduction

18% of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or questioning (LGBTQ) individuals avoided seeking medical attention for fear of discrimination according to a 2017 joint poll conducted by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health [1]. These fears are not unfounded—decades of anti-lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) prejudice in medicine, despite greater social acceptance in the United States have tainted medicine’s perception in the LGB community.

Only in 1987 was “sexual orientation disturbance” removed from the DSM while conversion therapy, the scientifically-unfounded exercise of converting one’s sexual orientation to heterosexual, continues to be legal across much of the United States. In 2015, a pediatrician in Michigan declined to see a child of a lesbian couple which spurred a national debate of refusal of care on the basis of religious freedom [2]. Just this year the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division of the Department of Health and Human Services was established [3]. It is clear why LGB individuals may want to avoid routine medical attention.

As a disclaimer, LGBT individuals are often lumped into one category. We will focus this post on LGB individuals as we believe that the transgender experience, while occasionally overlapping with that of LGB individuals, deserves its own recognition in another post. Many studies and data grouped LGB and transgender individuals as one group and will be cited as such in this post.

 

Health Disparities

34% of LGBT individuals reported having been a victim of bullying, instituting a fear of discrimination and coming out that can lead to a variety of emotional and psychological consequences [4]. In the National Health Interview Study, 26% and 28% of gay men and women, respectively, and 41% and 47% of bisexual men and women, respectively, reported moderate or severe levels of mental distress compared to 17% of straight men and 22% of straight women [6]. These levels of psychological stress make LGB individuals more prone to emotional disorders leading to suicidal ideation, homelessness, depression, and substance abuse [4].

Furthermore, 18% of LGBT individuals reported having been coerced into sex and 23% sexually assaulted [4]. This victimization increases their risk of unsafe sexual behavior than their peers resulting in a twice greater likelihood of contracting sexually transmitted diseases when compared to straight-identifying men [5]. The fear of seeking medical attention only exacerbates these health disparities.

While much of the focus has been on the modern experience of LGB youth, it is important to be aware the circumstances of LGB seniors that may contribute to health disparities. Due to the social climate in which they grew up, they are less likely to be partnered, have children, or other social supports, increasing their barriers to health care. Furthermore, they often reside in senior communities where they often face continued discrimination [7].

  

Creating a More Welcoming Environment for All

The emergency department is often the first point of healthcare contact for the vulnerable, and is therefore a prime location to make healthcare more approachable for the LGB community.

The Waiting Room

Patients often spend hours in the waiting room, providing an opportune time to set an inviting tone for LGB patients. LGB individuals constantly seek subtle indications of acceptance in unknown environments [11]. At the most basic level, triage forms can include questions pertaining to sexual orientation and gender identity [7]. In fact, collection of this data has been recommended by the Institute of Medicine and the Joint Commission [8]. These forms can also include the hospital’s non-discrimination policy on the basis of sexual orientation and offer a contact for a patient advocate for those who have been unfairly treated. Staff can wear rainbow flag pins and waiting rooms can offer pamphlets that highlight LGB health among other health topics [7]. These small additions can make LGB individuals feel more welcome.

 

With the Physician
Despite 78% of emergency physicians believing that patients would refuse to reveal their sexual orientation in the emergency department, only 10% of patient respondents of all sexual orientations (n=1516) to the EQUALITY study reported that they would not answer the question [8]. As summarized by Dr. Adil Haider, the principal investigator of the study, “your patients want to be asked.”

When asking patients about their sexual orientation, it is important to use gender-neutral language. Ask “are you in a relationship?” or “do you have sex with men, women, or both?” to delve into a social history. These types of questions may comfort LGB patients to allow them to expand on details they find relevant [9]. Of course, patients who are not comfortable with their identity may continue to conceal their sexual orientation. Each individual’s coming out experience varies and it is crucial that the physician allows the patient to take his or her own time to reveal their sexual orientation, even if not on this visit. Simply asking the broad questions without judgment may begin to change the patient’s apprehensive attitude towards medicine.

Going Above and Beyond

While important to make the clinical encounter more inviting, more actions can be taken to make a hospital a leader in LGB care.

1.   Partner with local LGB organizations

Hospitals can partner with organizations that support the LGB community. Having a presence in health clinics targeting LGB individuals and other local LGB organizations will also allow the hospital to better understand and adapt to the needs specific to the community. Celebrating LGBT awareness months and having staff march in local LGB Pride events is a very public and visible way of showing support for the community [9].

2.   Actively recruiting and maintaining LGB staff

Health care providers should actively recruit LGB staff by ensuring equal employment benefits as their heterosexual colleagues by offering supplemental packages that include benefits for both married and unmarried same-sex partners. After hiring, ensure that LGB employees continue to receive support and mentoring by sponsoring LGB employee groups and functions [9].

3.   Striving for and achieving a perfect score on the Human Rights Campaign Healthcare Equality Index

The Human Rights Campaign is the largest organization supporting LGBT rights in the United States. Each year, the Human Rights Campaign scores and publishes a list of many hospitals in the United States and grades them on hospitals’ ability to provide inclusive care regardless of sexual orientation. The list evaluates a hospital’s patient and employment non-discrimination policies, visitation rights, LGBT-focused training offering, presence of patient services to LGBT individuals, employee benefits, and commitment to the community for a total score on a scale from 0 to 100.10 For healthcare institutions not achieving a perfect 100 score, this is a great tool to ensure progression to full equity of care for LGB patients.

 

Summing it Up

Despite rapid social acceptance of the LGB community in the United States within the past decade, remnants of fear and distrust in healthcare remain, exacerbating existing health disparities. While it may take several decades to fully eradicate the apprehension, taking the steps above will certainly make strides to achieve that goal.


Expert Commentary

Thank you for writing about such an important topic. I think we all understand the special position of the emergency department beyond the care of emergencies; it is a point of access for many marginalized communities that have been unable to receive care through other venues. It is our duty as emergency physicians to be able to provide competent and appropriate care for all who walk through our doors.

I think it makes sense to divide the topic of LGBTQ care into two: sexual minorities (those who identify as lesbian/gay/bisexual/queer, etc) and gender minorities (those who identify as trans, genderqueer or otherwise gender nonconforming). While they have much in common, the barriers and healthcare disparities they face are unique and different, and they each warrant a lengthy discussion. I look forward to your article on the care of gender minorities!


Normalizing Care in the Emergency Department

  • Identifying Those in the Room

Asking “how are the two of you related?” to figure out who else is in the room can prevent mishaps of assuming someone is with their friend, when really they are with their partner. As a major support system after discharge, it’s important to include a patient’s partner in the discussion and plan.

  • Taking a Sexual History

It’s important to not conflate sexual orientation with sexual behaviors. For example, there is a well defined subsect of men who have sex with men (MSM) but do not identify as gay/bisexual. By asking “do you have sex with men, women, or both?” you ensure that you capture the data you need to treat the patient appropriately. Some people get hung up on the follow up questions to further identify how to treat a patient:

               “Do you have anal intercourse?”

               “Do you have receptive, penetrative, or both?”

The same model can be used for oral and vaginal intercourse.

  • Addressing the Sexual Health of Sexual Minorities

If you are addressing sexual health needs in the emergency room, either because of chief complaint (eg. sore throat, rectal pain, vaginal discharge, abdominal pain) or exposure, try and be as comprehensive as possible. The majority of syphilis cases in the US are amongst MSM [1], making it an important consideration. I suppose this blog is also as good a place as any to highlight the recent CDC recommendations for treatment of STIs, including [2]:

  1. Monotherapy with ceftriaxone for confirmed gonorrhea given increasing azithromycin resistance

  2. Increased dosing of ceftriaxone (500mg from 250mg) for gonorrhea treatment, and 1g of ceftriaxone for those >150kg

  3. Doxycycline 100mg BID for 7 days for chlamydia infections

    *Notably, compliance with a 7 day course of treatment should be addressed and factored into the decision (with regards to the previous standard of azithromycin 1g as a single dose).

Identifying Bias

Bias comes in two forms: explicit biases, which we are cognizant of, and implicit, which we are not. Implicit bias stems from the confluence of your life experiences and the society you are a part of. If you have been raised in a society entrenched in systemic racism, sexism, ableism and heteronormativity, you have been exposed to stereotypes and prejudices which may subconsciously shape the way you make decisions. Healthcare professionals have been shown to have a similar level of implicit bias compared to the general population [3], and this implicit bias has been correlated with significant patient outcomes. [4] What shapes your decision in who receives narcotic pain medication or who stays in the hospital for observation? I highly recommend taking at least a few tests of implicit bias which are freely available and, in my opinion, highly informative: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html

References

  1. CDC. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2013. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.

  2. St. Cyr S, Barbee L, Workowski KA, et al. Update to CDC’s Treatment Guidelines for Gonococcal Infection, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1911–1916. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6950a6external icon.

  3. FitzGerald, C., Hurst, S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 18, 19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8

  4. William J. Hall et al. “Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review”, American Journal of Public Health 105, no. 12 (December 1, 2015): pp. e60-e76.

Will Laplant MD, MPH

Emergency Medicine Physician

Good Samaritan Medical Center

Brockton, MA


How To Cite This Post:

[Peer-Reviewed, Web Publication] Feiger, D. Eswaran, V. (2021, May 2). Eliminating health disparities in LGBT individuals begins in the ED. [NUEM Blog. Expert Commentary by Laplant, W]. Retrieved from http://www.nuemblog.com/blog/lgbt-disparities


Other Posts You May Enjoy

References

  1. “Discrimination in America: Experiences and Views of LGBTQ Americans.” www.npr.org, National Public Radio, Nov. 2017, www.npr.org.

  2. Pear, Robert, and Jeremy W. Peters. “Trump Gives Health Workers New Religious Liberty Protections.” The New York Times, 18 Jan. 2018.

  3. Phillip, Abby. “Pediatrician Refuses to Treat Baby with Lesbian Parents and There’s Nothing Illegal about It.” The Washington Post, 19 Feb. 2015.

  4. Hafeez, Hudaisa, et al. “Health Care Disparities Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth: A Literature Review.” Cureus, 2017, doi:10.7759/cureus.1184.

  5. Robinson, Joseph P., and Dorothy L. Espelage. “Peer Victimization and Sexual Risk Differences Between Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, or Questioning and Nontransgender Heterosexual Youths in Grades 7–12.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 103, no. 10, 2013, pp. 1810–1819., doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301387.

  6. Gonzales, Gilbert, et al. “Comparison of Health and Health Risk Factors Between Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults and Heterosexual Adults in the United States.” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 176, no. 9, 2016, p. 1344., doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3432.

  7. Understanding the Health Needs of LGBT People. Understanding the Health Needs of LGBT People, National LGBT Health Education Center, 2016.

  8. Haider, Adil H., et al. “Emergency Department Query for Patient-Centered Approaches to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 177, no. 6, 2017, p. 819., doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0906.

  9. Ten Things: Creating Inclusive Health Care Environments for LGBT People. Ten Things: Creating Inclusive Health Care Environments for LGBT People, National LGBT Health Education Center, 2015.

  10. Human Rights Campaign. “Healthcare Equality Index 2018.” Human Rights Campaign, Human Rights Campaign, 2018, www.hrc.org/hei.

  11. Eliason, Michele J., and Robert Schope. “Does ‘Don't Ask Don't Tell’ Apply to Health Care? Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People's Disclosure to Health Care Providers.” Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, vol. 5, no. 4, Dec. 2001.

Posted on May 3, 2021 and filed under Advocacy.